January 26, 2010
African Centre for for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes // African Journal on Conflict Resolution
Abstract:
This paper examines the democratisation agenda laid out by Western governments
for the North African region vis-à-vis their Realpolitik conflict containment
approach towards the Western Sahara conflict. Western policymakers conceive
the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara as a safety
net that contains tension in the region and enables geo-strategic and economic
partnerships with Algeria and Morocco. This paper underlines that the
international community could play a greater role in promoting the long-term
stability of the North African region by pursuing innovative policies geared
towards addressing the root causes of the Western Sahara conflict....
January 21, 2010
United States Institute of Peace
Abstract:
This extensive paper examines the complex nexus between democratic change and U.S. security interests, with a principal focus on Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Yemen. It sets out a set of general and country-specific findings and recommendations for a long-term strategy by which “political liberalization” can enhance the stability and legitimacy of governments, thus strengthening security and peacemaking in the region. This report offers a set of general and country-specific findings and
recommendations to assist the Obama administration in its efforts to tackle
escalating security challenges while sustaining diplomatic, institutional and
economic support for democracy and human rights in the Greater Middle East.
The working group recognizes that addressing threats from terrorist
groups affiliated with al-Qaeda, as well as stemming conflicts arising from the
persistence of regional conflicts in the Middle East and South Asia, must be a top
priority. But, as the case studies of Yemen, Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon amply
demonstrate, long-term political stability, economic development and security
also requires a continued and even enhanced U.S. commitment, in both words
and deeds, to fostering democratic transformation, human rights and effective
governance. The architecture of security and peacemaking must be
accompanied by a revived focus on democratic reforms.
Absent such an effort, this study group believes that the already wide
political, social and ideological gap between states and societies will further
expand, thus making regimes, and even entire states vulnerable to internal and
external shocks. It is the task and challenge of genuine reformers in both the
regimes and oppositions of the Arab World and South Asia to chart an exit from
the cul-de-sac of arbitrary rule and state-managed political reform by defining a
common vision of substantive “democratic transformation.”...
January 18, 2010
Amnesty International
Abstract:
In 2009, the Kingdom of Morocco celebrated the 10th anniversary of the accession of King
Mohamed VI to the throne. The official discourse marking the occasion emphasized the
progress made since the rule of King Mohamed VI in a numbers of fields including
democratic governance, economic development and human rights. In the past decade, the
human rights situation in Morocco and Western Sahara witnessed some improvements.
However, the Moroccan authorities’ prevention of a weekly to distribute an issue carrying a
census on the popularity of the King in the wake of celebrations - albeit demonstrating a
favourable opinion of the ruler- was a grim reminder that some issues remain taboo and that
red lines continue to exist and to be enforced against those who dare to transcend them.1
There is no doubt that the human rights situation in Morocco and Western Sahara today has
much changed since the “years of lead” (les années de plomb)- a period under the rule of King
Hassan II marked by widespread political repression and grave violations of human rights. While
the whole period between Morocco’s independence in 1956 and the death of King Hassan II in
1999 was characterized by serious human rights violations, it is between the 1960s and early
1990s that human rights violations reached their highest level. Violations were particularly
rampant when the Moroccan authorities felt under internal or external security threat from
opponents of the status-quo such as in the aftermath of the attempted military coups and
during the armed conflict with the Polisario Front2. Systematic use of torture or other illtreatment,
the enforced disappearance of hundreds of individuals and the arbitrary detention of
thousands characterized this dark period....
January 13, 2010
German Institute of Global and Area Studies // Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien
Abstract:
Algeria’s intrastate war in the 1990s, during which militant Islamists and the state fought
fiercely against each other, still raises questions concerning the decisive factors leading to
its onset and escalation. This paper uses the resource curse approach and the rentier state
theory to understand the impact resource wealth could have had on the outbreak of this
violent conflict, then goes one step further, adopting a context‐sensitive approach. This
approach attempts to juxtapose those conditions directly linked to the resource sector with
the general conflict‐fueling conditions diagnosed in Algeria. It takes into account conditions
both within the country and in the international context. The application of a context
matrix allows us to examine the interplay of resource‐related factors and other conflictdriving
forces, such as socioeconomic, demographic and ideological changes. Such an approach
not only broadens the general understanding of the resource‐violence link but also
enhances our understanding of the eruption of violence in Algeria....
December 1, 2009
The Elcano Royal Institute // Real Instituto Elcano
Abstract:
The UN Strategy for North Africa can contribute to a recalibration of counterterrorism efforts in the region and to a stronger cooperation among regional stakeholders and between the region and external partners such as the EU, the UN and the US. Despite the considerable efforts by governments in North Africa, many of which pre-date the attacks of 11 September 2001, the terrorist threat there remains acute. The rapid growth of entwined transnational terrorist and other criminal networks operating between North Africa and the Sahel may be one of the most immediate causes of instability in the region. After providing an overview of the terrorist threats and vulnerabilities confronting North Africa, as well the region’s capacities to address the threat and obstacles to cooperation, this policy brief will highlight the potential significance of the UN Strategy for the region. Among other things, it will explain how this UN instrument could contribute to a recalibration of counterterrorism efforts in North Africa and to a strengthening of cooperation both among regional stakeholders and between the region and external partners including the EU, the UN and the US....